Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian's avatar

I don't foresee it being that bleak, in terms of decimating the Western world. Even if death rates remain at a level 40% above normal, that means 70,000 per week would die in the US rather than 50,000. The birth rate is below replacement, but immigration will make up a certain portion. According to https://www.census.gov/popclock/ there is a net gain of one person every 41 seconds. Population continues to rise not fall.

It would take events beyond what we are seeing with quackcine injury to make an alarming difference in US population. If food shortages do arise that will have an impact, but how much?

Of course, if the quackcine injury accelerates, the sheep may become alarmed, but we don't know yet if the numbers will settle or increase with further booster jabs. Maybe they will reduce lifespan and reduce fertility. Is that enough for the Malthusians? If they are seeking a cull of a more significant nature, the quackcines aren't doing it. Yet.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts