In Germany, pharmacies were instructed to not hand out hcq if the prescription said it was for COVID . If the prescription didn't specify, they were instructed to contact the doctor to specify it was for another indication than COVID. Only after specifying on the prescription that it was not for COVID, could they release the medication. A consequence of that was that no proof base could form for the claim that hcq was a working remedy against COVID.
There were similar cases of that in the US too. Pharmacists are not doctors and had no right to question let alone refuse to fill a prescription but they did. Who gave them the orders not to fill prescriptions for the treatment of COVID. That is what needs to be determined if it was the corporate headquarters of the pharmacy (ie CVS) then that is where the lawyers should start their lawsuits. Anyone going after the FDA is going to get nowhere.
It said that no off label prescriptions should be filled because then there would not be enough hcq for the people needing it for autoimmune purposes. Actually I found another article, from June, where this constraint was lifted, see below *). Only that I found that info only now not then, and doctors still kept adhering to the initial guideline (it's not just pharmacies, also doctors didn't want to take the supply away from those allegedly needing it more urgently; in the meantime also, sord had gotten around that hcq was not the silver bullet after all (thanks to deadly too late-overdosed studies) so then here was a new reason to not want to prescribe it. This is a really new phenomenon to me in these years, how ASSUMPTIONS were created, and then made use of. Totally oblique and invisible, and so efficient. Like an invisible hand. Masterful. I say we didn't have that before in that extent.
Epoch Times ran story after story of families fighting with the hospital to get their family members the drugs Ivermectin and HCQ. I have binders full of those stories. I personally was turned down a refill on my prescription of Ivermectin from CVS. They kept saying they were out of stock and didn't know when they would get it. Yet when I emailed the supplier they replied stating they had plenty available and sent me a list of those pharmacies. Yet, the pharmacies turned us down. We had to go through FLCCC.NET to finally get it. The FDA is responsible for the murder of patients. It's that simple.
In Germany, pharmacies were instructed to not hand out hcq if the prescription said it was for COVID . If the prescription didn't specify, they were instructed to contact the doctor to specify it was for another indication than COVID. Only after specifying on the prescription that it was not for COVID, could they release the medication. A consequence of that was that no proof base could form for the claim that hcq was a working remedy against COVID.
There were similar cases of that in the US too. Pharmacists are not doctors and had no right to question let alone refuse to fill a prescription but they did. Who gave them the orders not to fill prescriptions for the treatment of COVID. That is what needs to be determined if it was the corporate headquarters of the pharmacy (ie CVS) then that is where the lawyers should start their lawsuits. Anyone going after the FDA is going to get nowhere.
https://www.deutsche-apotheker-zeitung.de/news/artikel/2020/04/06/bfarm-keine-ambulanten-off-label-verordnungen-von-hydroxychloroquin
The article is in German and I sadly do not speak German. When I get the time I will try to get a translation.
...if u click the 3 vertical dots at the top right of ur screen Karen u get an immediate translate function!...
Thanks
It said that no off label prescriptions should be filled because then there would not be enough hcq for the people needing it for autoimmune purposes. Actually I found another article, from June, where this constraint was lifted, see below *). Only that I found that info only now not then, and doctors still kept adhering to the initial guideline (it's not just pharmacies, also doctors didn't want to take the supply away from those allegedly needing it more urgently; in the meantime also, sord had gotten around that hcq was not the silver bullet after all (thanks to deadly too late-overdosed studies) so then here was a new reason to not want to prescribe it. This is a really new phenomenon to me in these years, how ASSUMPTIONS were created, and then made use of. Totally oblique and invisible, and so efficient. Like an invisible hand. Masterful. I say we didn't have that before in that extent.
*) https://www.deutsche-apotheker-zeitung.de/news/artikel/2020/07/08/bfarm-hebt-regeln-fuer-hydroxychloroquin-auf
Ah yes. Fascism rides again
They are slick if nothing else.
Epoch Times ran story after story of families fighting with the hospital to get their family members the drugs Ivermectin and HCQ. I have binders full of those stories. I personally was turned down a refill on my prescription of Ivermectin from CVS. They kept saying they were out of stock and didn't know when they would get it. Yet when I emailed the supplier they replied stating they had plenty available and sent me a list of those pharmacies. Yet, the pharmacies turned us down. We had to go through FLCCC.NET to finally get it. The FDA is responsible for the murder of patients. It's that simple.
...'trust the science' should come with a disclaimer that it does not necessarily imply any suggestion intimating ur trust of the scientist!...