12 Comments

RFK Jr: That's a moving speech. He left us wondering where he stands on abortion. That's the acid test of a politician in my mind. If they aren't against abortion, I'm not for them. If they don't value and protect unborn life, they can spout all the constitutional stuff, all the human rights stuff, all the corruption stuff they want, and I simply see them as political opportunists. They'll say anything for a vote, and we can never hold them accountable for what they do in office.

Expand full comment
author

Brent.......it doesn't really matter because the next President was already selected the day after Biden took office. They will steal the election in 2024 as they have for many decades. The biggest steals beginning with Obama. Again there were steals before Obama too but his was the biggest most professional. I will vote because I won't make the steal easy for them. And we all must get up and go vote not because our vote will count but because God helps those that help themselves and miracle do happen. If God does not consider us worthy of his miracles then at least we will have made them work for their steal.

Expand full comment

Or you are seeing your readers are paying attention 🤓 Thank you Karen

Expand full comment

As primarily an observer of things being said, I still believe that Dr. David Martin is doing good work. I may not word things in exactly the same way, but I believe his ability to articulate the most important parts and provide some guidance toward change is important. I think undercovering all sorts of facets are important, but in order to bring about an overriding message that the layperson should understand by reading things in black and white, it's apparent, it's all been a huge planned experiment without proper informed consent. Things are being said within a wide range from literally, figuratively, hypothetically, using both inference and deduction. Depending on the person listening it can easily be taken the wrong way. Moreover, just because a person worked on a project at one point in time, does not mean they are controlled opposition or not to be believed now. With more information, it is fine to change tracks. For example, if mRNA technology for cancer research was my dissertation, would that only make me evil? I don't believe so. Now if I were not to provide informed consent on purpose just for the ability to experiment, that is evil. So while I believe there is no one hero in this nor should we focus on who are the heroes more so than the issues, the things he says and how he says it, does resonate with me, and if I prove to be wrong in the future, then I'm wrong.

Expand full comment
author

I make no judgement on Dr. Martin but I always share all sides of the story even if I myself may disagree with the information being shared. I respect my subscribers ability to take both sides and decide for themselves. I have provided both positive and negative information about many people.

Expand full comment

I whole heartedly like what you say. I have never heard anything about Pasheem S and his journalism. I have had the privilege to see and hear R Fuellmich speak, along with Patrick Wood ( Citizens for Free Speech and Technocracy.news ) along with Dr Richard M Fleming PhD, MD, JD he is a Physicist, Nuclear Cardiologist, and attorney, who has been working on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 since January of 2020. Guess what, I believe the above mentioned people!

Expand full comment
author

Pasheem is just the subscriber that sent the article by Omar Jordan regarding Dr. Martin. There are many good folks out there but we also must be careful not to be too trusting of anyone. I too have followed Patrick Wood, Dr. Fuellmich (I have actually communicated with Reiner) and the same with Dr Fleming. I only share the information. It is up to people to come to their own decision.

Expand full comment

Appreciate your continuous information but cannot support you on your statement that the Constitution is not a living document. That is why we have Amendments to the Constitution and given that our history includes slavery and disenfranchising that population of Americans we should be much more focused on who is really for the people than their birthplace. My children were born in Europe but have birth abroad certificates from the US embassy...would you disqualify

them because they were not born on US soil too? What the US needs to do is clean house in our government and we cannot do this with any insider at this point. It is too corrupt. Actually I do think that you can clearly see that no mainstream media covers Shiva and that he is a threat to the theater. He actually exposed voter fraud in Maricopa county. For that reason he does not have great chances but his movement is spot on.

I would also like to suggest that you cover Cal Washington and his Inpower movement as people need to feel they can take action against the health threats we are being faced with and his notice of liability is the way to go en masse. Elections will not be so important if we can hold all who push and promote threats to our health accountable. Thank you for your work.

Expand full comment
author

A living document is one that is frequently and consistently updated or edited. Our Constitution does not fit that definition. Yes it can be amended but again that does not fit the true definition of "a living document." Shiva, Harris, Rubio, Ramaswamy, Cruz are not NBC because of the citizenship of their fathers at the the time of their birth. I have explained this and supplied factual documentation in the true definition of NBC many times. It is not the place of birth but the citizenship of the father alone that determines a child's natural citizenship status. Simple as that. You and others may not like that definition but that is what it was in the days of our founders and nothing to date has changed that. 8 times they have tried to remove NBC as a requirement for President and VP. The last time was when Obama was a Senator. Each time it failed. If your children were born in Europe to an American father they are natural born citizens. Over time people twist definitions to fit an agenda and the meaning of NBC is no exception. You either believe in the Constitution or you don't. You cannot pick the parts you like and discard the parts you don't. Perhaps this might help you understand the importance of NBC. https://newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams301.htm

I like Dr. Shiva very much and if he were a NBC I could surely support him. He is brilliant and he pulls no punches. There are many political offices he could hold that could probably affect change better than being President or VP. Running for US Senate would be a place he could really help to enlighten people and bring about change. What you think you can do as President and what is reality is not the same.

Expand full comment

Please address my comment about Inpower. Like Dr. Shiva and his systems science education platform, Cal Washington offers real solutions based on his legal life experiences and they are working. He is also closely aligned with Biblical teachings. Both of these true leaders seek to empower people so they do not feel helpless.

Expand full comment
author

None of this has anything to do with the fact that he is not a natural born citizen and therefore not constitutional eligible to be President or VP. This takes nothing away from the fact that his is a good, brilliant man he is just not eligible to be President or VP and I believe in following the Constitution regardless. If enough people believe this requirement needs to be changed then they can attempt to amend the Constitution but it had failed already 8 times so it appears as if most people believe in following the law of the land.

Expand full comment
author

There are many way to empower people. President/VP is the least of those ways.

Expand full comment