Farley Mowat, the noted Canadian leftist and Greenpeace activist, and whose house my wife used to walk by regularly as a kid in Port Hope, ON., (she said he always had a big fake or stuffed owl in his window) wrote in his book West Viking (written while we were still in the global cooling scare) that there were probably at least dwarf forests growing in Greenland when the Vikings arrived in 985 AD and the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History reports “… Erik the Red discovered two areas of southwest Greenland which were suitable for farming, with grasslands and small stands of alder and birch.” You will note that it is too cold today for any type of forests to grow in Greenland, and there is zero ability to farm, unless modern technologies are utilized – and even then, crop selection is very minimal. Mowat also reported the Arctic pack ice was much less in that Viking discovery era than today. Dr. Fred Singer writes that when the Vikings first settled Greenland, they grew vegetables, and it was warm enough to allow the population to grow to 3,000 people and by 1100 AD the place was thriving enough that they had their own bishop and twelve churches. Nature reported in a 2010 article that clamshell studies also confirm Norse records. Meanwhile, the Archeological Survey of Canada has also noted around “A.D. 1000, a warmer climate resulted in the tree line advancing 100 kilometres north of its present position.” The results of this? Especially in northern Europe, “the period between 1150 and 1300 was truly a flowering period, for population reached unprecedented levels that were never to be seen again until the late 18thcentury in many countries; the English population experienced a staggering threefold increase in its population during the last century since the Domesday Survey in 1086”. This climate optimum (also called a climate anomaly) coincided with a period of increased solar activity (see below). Farming of various crops extended hundreds of kilometers farther north than it is possible today. Haym Benaroya, distinguished professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Rutgers Univ added “There is plenty of evidence that average temperatures where higher during the so-called Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period (when grapes and citrus fruits were grown in England) and in the early Holocene (right after the last Ice Age ended).” The climate emergency is “fiction” he said.
The truth is, there has been global warming recently – but it started around the time of the Revolutionary war, and today we are still BELOW the average of the past 3,000 years. And this is not just for Europe, Greenland and North America, yet another red herring that has recently been thrown out by the desperate global warmers. The universality of the Viking and Mediaeval climatic optimums is written about by Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.274.5292.1504 the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment
VERY VERY interesting. My friend and author of Cold Sun said the sun goes into hibernation approx. every 250 years. When that happens the climate cools and he also said we have been in a period of cooling for several years now. Bottom line......these psychopaths KNOW they are spewing lies, deceit and garbage. They KNOW it. Just remember "the agenda is NEVER the agenda."
There is such a massive corpus of material on the sun from the very top climatologists it isn't even close to funny. Here's just one citation (links don't copy, but can provide if needed): My older brother did his grad work in meteorology and studied under Reid Bryson, who at his death was THE most quoted meteorologist in history, and who said things like "If the climate were a 100 story bldg, man's contribution would be equivalent to the lineoleum on the first floor" and "I could spit in the ocean and have more effect than man's contribution to global warming."
---------------------
Theoretical astrophysicist Valentina Zharkova, lead author of the study that reproduced the summary curve of solar activity for the last 3 000 years and predicted Modern grand minimum in 2020 – 2055, says the sun may soon enter a period of significantly reduced activity. The reduced solar activity could possibly cause a mini ice age similar to the Maunder Minimum in just 15 years from now. Their forecasting model has shown to have a 97% accuracy when mapping the past movements of sunspots, using data of solar cycles. Her work a https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.04482.pdf Her work discussing solar minima, reviewed here, goes backwards three millennia revealing 9 grand cycles lasting 350-400 years each. The summary curve shows a remarkable resemblance to the past sunspot and terrestrial activity: grand minima – Maunder Minimum (1645-1715 AD), Wolf minimum (1280-1350 AD), Oort minimum (1010-1050 AD) and Homer minimum (800-900 BC); grand maxima – modern warm period (1990-2015), medieval warm period (900-1200 AD), Roman warm period (400-10 BC) and others. Zharkova video here. Ole Humlum in Science Direct reports the same, reporing he identified persistent cyclic variations in records from Svalbard and Greenland,with some identified cycles corresponding to variations in the Moons' orbit around Earth, some identified cycles correspond to solar variations, all leading up to the fact that warming since 1850 is mainly the result of natural climatic variations, where persistence of cycles makes climate forecasting feasible for limited time ranges. As well, NASA research shows the same as Zharkova, as reported here and shown below (note: this is a prediction, not a 100% confirmation). ... and speaking of debates, Al Gore has refused to debate the following experts: Dennis Avery, author of Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years, Lord Christopher Monckton (former Margaret Thatcher advisor), Bjorn Lomborg (Danish economist), author Michael Crichton, Prof. S. Fred Singer (former director of the U.S. National Weather Service), Tim Ball, Ph.D., (historical climatologist), Prof. Ian Clark (University of Ottawa), and climatologist Prof. Richard Lindzen of MIT. One has to wonder what our Nobel prize winner is afraid of, and why he won’t let the truth contend in an open debate? See “Gore Refuses to Debate Global Warming Theory,” Aug. 6, 2007, Newsmax.com
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
“Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data...That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a certain corruption within the climate science community.” Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric science, MIT
Dr. John Clauser, the co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize and one the world’s leading authorities on quantum mechanics, blasted “climate emergency” claims as a “dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.” Clauser, who was also awarded the 2010 Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel, warns that misguided climate science is a hoax that is being driven by “massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.”
Aug., 2023, citing extensive data to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong. “The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule. All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.” Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. Here is the cover letter, followed by the summary pages of that document supporting their testimony to the EPA.https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Happer-Lindzen-EPA-Power-Plants-2023-07-19.pdf
Dr. Norman Fenton Professor Emeritus of Rish, Queen Mary Univ. of London, here, summer 2023, session on Climate Change at the Better Way Conference, Bath, UK, 2023. “The entire mainstream Covid narrative was driven by easily manipulated statistics based on flawed definitions, data and modelling…the same type of data manipulation and flawed modelling has been used for many years to exaggerate the ‘climate crisis, and the impact of humans on it… What has been very effective is the mass censorship of dissenting concerns about the climate narrative and the Covid narrative… the same censorship is being used to shut down evidence about how unnecessary and devastating the net zero 2050 target will be for normal people.”
Claude Allegre, a “founding father of AGW theory,” has now come out against this, stating “The cause of this climate change is unknown.”
“What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that carbon dioxide from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. “It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that carbon dioxide, the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.”— Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science, MIT. Source https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8855233-238421.pdf
2023 Norwegian climatologist study from Statistics Norway, Statistisk Sentralbyrå: "Using theoretical arguments and statistical tests we find that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be strong enough to cause systematic changes in the temperature fluctuations during the last 200 years. Even if recent recorded temperature variations should turn out to deviate from previous variation patterns in a systematic way it is still a difficult challenge to establish how much of this change is due to increasing man-made emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases." See study PDF, entitled To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions? See video on this here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTk73LqFTVo&ab_channel=CDN or from the report:
That infographic could not have illustrated the WEF, UN, WHO, Schwab, Gates, Soros plan any better! I'm sure I left out many more villains in this list!
Thanks. Lets not forget the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet and of course there are many more. The UN has never been about peace or helping the poor in 3rd world countries. They have always been about global communism but no one would listen and many still today are brainwashed about the UN.
Absolutely 100%; the Rockefellers wedged their way into the medical industry early on by destroying the hemp industry and substituting it for the pharmaceutical industry. I posted a 9 part documentary on my website on the free resources page called Cult of Medics https://medicaltruthpodcast.com/free-medical-resources-and-tools/
Farley Mowat, the noted Canadian leftist and Greenpeace activist, and whose house my wife used to walk by regularly as a kid in Port Hope, ON., (she said he always had a big fake or stuffed owl in his window) wrote in his book West Viking (written while we were still in the global cooling scare) that there were probably at least dwarf forests growing in Greenland when the Vikings arrived in 985 AD and the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History reports “… Erik the Red discovered two areas of southwest Greenland which were suitable for farming, with grasslands and small stands of alder and birch.” You will note that it is too cold today for any type of forests to grow in Greenland, and there is zero ability to farm, unless modern technologies are utilized – and even then, crop selection is very minimal. Mowat also reported the Arctic pack ice was much less in that Viking discovery era than today. Dr. Fred Singer writes that when the Vikings first settled Greenland, they grew vegetables, and it was warm enough to allow the population to grow to 3,000 people and by 1100 AD the place was thriving enough that they had their own bishop and twelve churches. Nature reported in a 2010 article that clamshell studies also confirm Norse records. Meanwhile, the Archeological Survey of Canada has also noted around “A.D. 1000, a warmer climate resulted in the tree line advancing 100 kilometres north of its present position.” The results of this? Especially in northern Europe, “the period between 1150 and 1300 was truly a flowering period, for population reached unprecedented levels that were never to be seen again until the late 18thcentury in many countries; the English population experienced a staggering threefold increase in its population during the last century since the Domesday Survey in 1086”. This climate optimum (also called a climate anomaly) coincided with a period of increased solar activity (see below). Farming of various crops extended hundreds of kilometers farther north than it is possible today. Haym Benaroya, distinguished professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Rutgers Univ added “There is plenty of evidence that average temperatures where higher during the so-called Medieval Warm Period, the Roman Warm Period (when grapes and citrus fruits were grown in England) and in the early Holocene (right after the last Ice Age ended).” The climate emergency is “fiction” he said.
The truth is, there has been global warming recently – but it started around the time of the Revolutionary war, and today we are still BELOW the average of the past 3,000 years. And this is not just for Europe, Greenland and North America, yet another red herring that has recently been thrown out by the desperate global warmers. The universality of the Viking and Mediaeval climatic optimums is written about by Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.274.5292.1504 the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment
VERY VERY interesting. My friend and author of Cold Sun said the sun goes into hibernation approx. every 250 years. When that happens the climate cools and he also said we have been in a period of cooling for several years now. Bottom line......these psychopaths KNOW they are spewing lies, deceit and garbage. They KNOW it. Just remember "the agenda is NEVER the agenda."
There is such a massive corpus of material on the sun from the very top climatologists it isn't even close to funny. Here's just one citation (links don't copy, but can provide if needed): My older brother did his grad work in meteorology and studied under Reid Bryson, who at his death was THE most quoted meteorologist in history, and who said things like "If the climate were a 100 story bldg, man's contribution would be equivalent to the lineoleum on the first floor" and "I could spit in the ocean and have more effect than man's contribution to global warming."
---------------------
Theoretical astrophysicist Valentina Zharkova, lead author of the study that reproduced the summary curve of solar activity for the last 3 000 years and predicted Modern grand minimum in 2020 – 2055, says the sun may soon enter a period of significantly reduced activity. The reduced solar activity could possibly cause a mini ice age similar to the Maunder Minimum in just 15 years from now. Their forecasting model has shown to have a 97% accuracy when mapping the past movements of sunspots, using data of solar cycles. Her work a https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.04482.pdf Her work discussing solar minima, reviewed here, goes backwards three millennia revealing 9 grand cycles lasting 350-400 years each. The summary curve shows a remarkable resemblance to the past sunspot and terrestrial activity: grand minima – Maunder Minimum (1645-1715 AD), Wolf minimum (1280-1350 AD), Oort minimum (1010-1050 AD) and Homer minimum (800-900 BC); grand maxima – modern warm period (1990-2015), medieval warm period (900-1200 AD), Roman warm period (400-10 BC) and others. Zharkova video here. Ole Humlum in Science Direct reports the same, reporing he identified persistent cyclic variations in records from Svalbard and Greenland,with some identified cycles corresponding to variations in the Moons' orbit around Earth, some identified cycles correspond to solar variations, all leading up to the fact that warming since 1850 is mainly the result of natural climatic variations, where persistence of cycles makes climate forecasting feasible for limited time ranges. As well, NASA research shows the same as Zharkova, as reported here and shown below (note: this is a prediction, not a 100% confirmation). ... and speaking of debates, Al Gore has refused to debate the following experts: Dennis Avery, author of Unstoppable Global Warming Every 1,500 Years, Lord Christopher Monckton (former Margaret Thatcher advisor), Bjorn Lomborg (Danish economist), author Michael Crichton, Prof. S. Fred Singer (former director of the U.S. National Weather Service), Tim Ball, Ph.D., (historical climatologist), Prof. Ian Clark (University of Ottawa), and climatologist Prof. Richard Lindzen of MIT. One has to wonder what our Nobel prize winner is afraid of, and why he won’t let the truth contend in an open debate? See “Gore Refuses to Debate Global Warming Theory,” Aug. 6, 2007, Newsmax.com
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly….As a scientist I remain skeptical.” - Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology and formerly of NASA who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”
“Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data...That the data should always need correcting to agree with models is totally implausible and indicative of a certain corruption within the climate science community.” Dr. Richard Lindzen, professor of atmospheric science, MIT
Dr. John Clauser, the co-winner of the 2022 Nobel Physics prize and one the world’s leading authorities on quantum mechanics, blasted “climate emergency” claims as a “dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people.” Clauser, who was also awarded the 2010 Wolf Prize in Physics, the second most prestigious physics award after the Nobel, warns that misguided climate science is a hoax that is being driven by “massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.”
Aug., 2023, citing extensive data to support their case, William Happer, professor emeritus in physics at Princeton University, and Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), argued that the claims used by the EPA to justify the new regulations are not based on scientific facts but rather political opinions and speculative models that have consistently proven to be wrong. “The unscientific method of analysis, relying on consensus, peer review, government opinion, models that do not work, cherry-picking data and omitting voluminous contradictory data, is commonly employed in these studies and by the EPA in the Proposed Rule,” Mr. Happer and Mr. Lindzen stated. “None of the studies provides scientific knowledge, and thus none provides any scientific support for the Proposed Rule. All of the models that predict catastrophic global warming fail the key test of the scientific method: they grossly overpredict the warming versus actual data,” they stated. “The scientific method proves there is no risk that fossil fuels and carbon dioxide will cause catastrophic warming and extreme weather.” Climate models like the ones that the EPA is using have been consistently wrong for decades in predicting actual outcomes, Mr. Happer told The Epoch Times. Here is the cover letter, followed by the summary pages of that document supporting their testimony to the EPA.https://co2coalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Happer-Lindzen-EPA-Power-Plants-2023-07-19.pdf
Dr. Norman Fenton Professor Emeritus of Rish, Queen Mary Univ. of London, here, summer 2023, session on Climate Change at the Better Way Conference, Bath, UK, 2023. “The entire mainstream Covid narrative was driven by easily manipulated statistics based on flawed definitions, data and modelling…the same type of data manipulation and flawed modelling has been used for many years to exaggerate the ‘climate crisis, and the impact of humans on it… What has been very effective is the mass censorship of dissenting concerns about the climate narrative and the Covid narrative… the same censorship is being used to shut down evidence about how unnecessary and devastating the net zero 2050 target will be for normal people.”
Claude Allegre, a “founding father of AGW theory,” has now come out against this, stating “The cause of this climate change is unknown.”
“What historians will definitely wonder about in future centuries is how deeply flawed logic, obscured by shrewd and unrelenting propaganda, actually enabled a coalition of powerful special interests to convince nearly everyone in the world that carbon dioxide from human industry was a dangerous, planet-destroying toxin. “It will be remembered as the greatest mass delusion in the history of the world - that carbon dioxide, the life of plants, was considered for a time to be a deadly poison.”— Richard Lindzen, professor emeritus of atmospheric science, MIT. Source https://www.sec.gov/comments/climate-disclosure/cll12-8855233-238421.pdf
2023 Norwegian climatologist study from Statistics Norway, Statistisk Sentralbyrå: "Using theoretical arguments and statistical tests we find that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be strong enough to cause systematic changes in the temperature fluctuations during the last 200 years. Even if recent recorded temperature variations should turn out to deviate from previous variation patterns in a systematic way it is still a difficult challenge to establish how much of this change is due to increasing man-made emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases." See study PDF, entitled To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions? See video on this here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTk73LqFTVo&ab_channel=CDN or from the report:
That infographic could not have illustrated the WEF, UN, WHO, Schwab, Gates, Soros plan any better! I'm sure I left out many more villains in this list!
Thanks. Lets not forget the Rockefellers, Warren Buffet and of course there are many more. The UN has never been about peace or helping the poor in 3rd world countries. They have always been about global communism but no one would listen and many still today are brainwashed about the UN.
Absolutely 100%; the Rockefellers wedged their way into the medical industry early on by destroying the hemp industry and substituting it for the pharmaceutical industry. I posted a 9 part documentary on my website on the free resources page called Cult of Medics https://medicaltruthpodcast.com/free-medical-resources-and-tools/
AWESOME. Thank you. I will be sure to check out your site.
Wow. Incredible. Will let others know. Thank you