5 Comments

I agree with you totally, as it happens, I had a Hysterectomy over 30 years ago, I did not want any more kids or for that matter painful periods - the vaccines are known to change the DNA in 5 hours from injection and sterilize within 8 hours - so unless there is any evidence, contrary to the above, I am inclined to think, no more kids either. I also think there is the possibility of stopping the killing of those vaccinated, but unfortunately, I don't see how that can reverse any damage already done, by the 99% Graphene Oxide injections, which pass through the brain, blood, barrier into the inner workings of the body, in the Lipid packages, along with the reported nanotechnology too.

Have to hope they get theirs and head over to the bad side, after they die - hopefully I'm bound for the good side - shrug!!- see you there?

Expand full comment

Why thank you for that "Truth Bomb, much appreciated - I wonder how the ruling applies to these new ventures: A New Way to Reproduce Scientists are trying to manufacture eggs and sperm in the laboratory. Will it end reproduction as we know it? AND Scientists might soon be able to create eggs and sperm from skin and blood cells. What will that mean? By Jessica Hamzelou archive page August 23, 2022 Amrita Marino Scientists might soon be able to create eggs and sperm from skin and blood cells. An embryo forms when sperm meets egg. But what if we could start with other cells—if a blood sample or skin biopsy could be transformed into “artificial” sperm and eggs? What if those were all you needed to make a baby?

How Silicon Valley hatched a plan to turn blood into human eggs A well-connected startup company is trying to rewrite the rules of reproduction.

Conception, a company employing a team of around 30 scientists in Berkeley, California, aims to “turn stem cells into human eggs”

That’s the promise of a radical approach to reproduction. Scientists have already created artificial eggs and sperm from mouse cells and used them to create mouse pups. Artificial human sex cells are next.

Evidence has emerged which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the pharmaceutical giant Moderna, the company that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection, actually created the Covid-19 virus.

They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.Furthermore they did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2:as well.So Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid19 its infectivity to humans by patented gain of function research as early as 2013, 6 years before the Wuhan outbreak took place. Not 3 as reported in the Mail and virally elsewhere. The Expose

In a statement, Moderna explained the alleged infringement: "Moderna believes Pfizer and BioNTech copied two key features of Moderna's patented technologies which are critical to the success of mRNA vaccines. When COVID-19 emerged, neither Pfizer nor BioNTech had Moderna's level of experience with developing mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases, and they knowingly followed Moderna's lead in developing their own vaccine."First, Pfizer and BioNTech took four different vaccine candidates into clinical testing, which included options that would have steered clear of Moderna's innovative path. Pfizer and BioNTech, however, ultimately decided to proceed with a vaccine that has the same exact mRNA chemical modification to its vaccine as Spikevax®. Moderna scientists began developing this chemical modification that avoids provoking an undesirable immune response when mRNA is introduced into the body in 2010 and were the first to validate it in human trials in 2015."Second, and again despite having many different options, Pfizer and BioNTech copied Moderna's approach to encode for the full-length spike protein in a lipid nanoparticle formulation for a coronavirus. Moderna scientists developed this approach when they created a vaccine for the coronavirus that causes Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) years before COVID-19 first emerged."None of the patent rights which Moderna is seeking to enforce relate to any intellectual property generated during Moderna's collaboration with the National Institutes of Health to combat COVID-19. That collaboration began only after the patented technologies at issue here were proven successful in clinical trials in 2015 and 2016."KCRA3News

An alarming number of vaccine recipients suffered from severe and debilitating complications. Growing increasingly concerned, the physician decided to study messenger RNA (mRNA) and its effects on DNA. After speaking with colleagues and conducting numerous experiments, she made a startling discovery. When the Bluetooth setting was activated near immunized individuals, a "unique identification code" appeared on her smartphone’s screen. Each person seemingly contained an internal technological device. During an interview transcribed by Orwell City, Dr. Brandolino shared her startling findings: Mónica Calcedo: The chip. Is that real or a lie? Dr. Brandolino: It’s a nanoprocessor. I say again that it is in plain view for those who want to see the micrographs of the electron microscope study made by Dr. Kalcker. It’s clearly seen in the magnification: a small, perfect, quadrangular, precise-edged, metallic corpuscle which is the same as any nanoprocessor in nanotechnology-responsive devices. That nanoprocessor is driven from a 4G Plus or 5G antenna. That is, all G technology is the same. The difference lies in that the packet of information that an antenna can transmit, is much larger in 4G Plus and 5G, 6G, and 7G. All that compact information is handled by a nanoprocessor— in a device which will be just inside our cells. By having Morgellons in the polyethylene glycol, they’re self-reproducing, it’s self-replicating. But because it’s in graphene… Graphene is a catalyst and, as I explained to you, makes that cell resonate with the 5G antenna and the microwaves of human thought. Can you understand that? There’s a nanoprocessor driven (transmission/transmitted) by a 5G antenna that goes directly to the workings of our brain.

I estimated that each person vaccinated, has a 2.22% chance per second, of being next on the random transmission's call to the nanoprocessor which orders the death of each body, bearing in mind The Lancet have previously said that the Pfizer vaccines are 0.87% effective in stopping Covid, which we know to be true - they simply don't.

For an “intelligent” species, we, those vaccinated, sure are stupid.

Expand full comment
author

I believe the future is that all humans are sterile and this way they can create new humans as needed in the lab. This is why the push for LGBTQ, Trans etc. Sex with anyone, anytime and no pregnancy. Sounds crazy but these people ARE cray-cray. They are Godless and have no soul or conscience. They are spawns of Satan.

Expand full comment

According to the US Supreme Court Law in 2013, a person who has the mRNA vaccines loses their human rights and becomes Trans Human with zero human rights with world wide application. - so the vaccinated cannot lawyer up and take on the vaccine makers, who have blanket immunity from prosecution, because the vaccinated agreed to take an "Experimental Test Vaccines" under Trump and Biden's "Emergency Protocols" and nothing can be done to change that, by law.

What is interesting is the theoretical number of vaccinate people dying around the world, where we assume that so far 7 billion (we are told) have been vaccinated.

We need a “Rule Of Thumb” to estimate how many people are dying, or being injured, around the world from these vaccines, from heart attacks, if those deaths are by signals to the brain, using the nanoprocessor to send the kill message, causing the body to have a heart attack and potentially die.

So let’s assume that one computer is canceling a life every second = 60 seconds to one minute x 60 minutes to one hour x 24 hours to one day x 365 days to one year, until more accurate numbers are given – so the mathematical equation is 60x60x24x365 = 31,536,000 as a baseline of vaccine deaths out of 7.4 billion vaccinated each year, so far.

Here’s how numbers from 100,000 to 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (nonillion) look when written out with the correct groups of three 0s.

Name Number of Zeros Written Out

One Thousand31,000Ten Thousand410,000One Hundred Thousand5100,000One Million61,000,000Billion91,000,000,000Trillion121,000,000,000,000Quadrillion151,000,000,000,000,000Quintillion181,000,000,000,000,000,000Sextillion211,000,000,000,000,000,000,000Septillion241,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000Octillion271,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000Nonillion301,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

So dividing 31,536,000 into 7,000,000,000 (7 billion) gives us a percentage likelihood of getting the death/injury call = 2.22% chance, if vaccinated, at this time and a 97.78% of not getting it, per second.

So statistically, 31,536,000 people are dying or being injured yearly from the mRNA vaccines, as a rough rule of thumb and everyone vaccinated has a 2.22% chance, each second, that the next death/injury call, is for their nanoprocessor, effectively being given the order to self terminate.

With the Pfizer vaccine having an 0.87% efficiency rate, the chances of dying from it, or Moderna's or one of the other vaccine makers shots (up to 1.5%) death/injury by nanoprocessor self terminating call, is impressively greater at 2.22%, per second at ths time, so far as we can calculate to Arrive at 31,536,000 injuries and deaths per year, around the world, from vaccine shots.

Expand full comment
author

This has been proven not to be true. The Supreme Court case in 2013 did not declare a person taking mRNA to be trans human. If they were ever to admit this (even if true) they would be guilty of crimes against humanity. Of course that doesn’t mean much today but I think this got twisted around to meet an agenda. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/vaccine-transhuman-claims-patently-wrong-on-us-supreme-court-ruling/

Expand full comment