CARBON NEUTRAL?? The thing that separates the intelligent from the imbecilic is found in the quote at the beginning of today's post: "....most people's opinions form their facts."
Put 1000 devotees of the carbon reduction movement in a room and ask them a few simple questions:
Where does CO2 come from?
How do you know carbon is a pollutant?
If our environment is stable, now, what will be the effect of lowering the CO2 level?
How will we know we've reached the optimum CO2 level and can go back to living normally?
If the CO2 problem is eliminated, will taxes go down?
Of course, there is no possibility of answering these questions factually, or honestly, without abandoning the entire carbon hoax. But, one thing is true: you would not change one liberal's mind.
I'm not sure what you're asking on the cancer article, Jerome, but maybe it's related to this...?
The covid shots are apparently known to cause severe issues in what seem rather random body areas and at random timings after the shot. Separately, 5G is known to have certain affects on biomass and possibly on graphene et al within the shot elements. So, the 5G frequencies (very different from other frequencies) is possibly activating, and/or accelerating, the various cancerous and clotting issues presented by the shots.
Sincere apologies if this was not your question.
Also, I use qualifiers like "possibly", "seems like", etc to restrain those who are still not convinced of the deadly effects of the shot and of 5G etc.
I worked several years face-to-face with dozens of MDs and PhDs and others on dozens of NIH funded studies (including 1 DOD funded virus study) at various top USA university medical labs and have seen levels of fudging, twisting, obfuscating, and sometimes out right lying about test results... all based on professional and employment fears, greed, and power. It was growing very strongly a few years ago, so must be a massive and terrible issue now.
20 MPH. OK, this one hit a nerve. I know this is mostly going on in the UK.
I've been driving since I was 12 years old. I've operated everything from farm tractors to motorcycles, to tractor-trailers to school buses to passenger vehicles.
There is an ideal speed-to-load ratio for every vehicle. When it comes to vehicles designed for roadways, it is NOT below 40 mph. The gearing, engine RPM, etc., are designed to propel the vehicle at roadway speeds.
This is what angers me about Pennsylvania roads in populated areas. The traffic geniuses intentionally time traffic lights so, driving at the posted speed, you'll hit red lights.
I spoke with a traffic engineer about a stretch of roadway about 20 miles through an urban area where I travel from our airport. I often drive it between midnight and 4:00 am when there is almost no traffic. I found that I can hit green lights driving 78 mph, or 12 mph. Otherwise, I'm stopping at every other light.
Their rationale is that it "calms the traffic." Yes, that's a direct quote! I told the pinhead who said it: "BULL-SH**!!" It enrages drivers and gobbles fuel! ...especially when traffic is heavy and riddled with big trucks.
And, at midnight, it's my "whack-a-mole" game with the cops to see if I can get home without a ticket.
He was the perfect embodiment of the "....most people use opinion to form their facts."
Finally, I've concluded that there IS NO MORE DANGEROUS SPEED TO TRAVEL than below 20 mph: What is the ONLY reason you drive that slow? It's because there's a damn sign telling you to! That necessarily means a cop is waiting for you to exceed it.
So, instead of your eyes on the road, where are they? ON THE SPEEDOMETER, or looking for the cop!
School zones are the worst! The 15 mph speed limit with a cop sitting in the median ready to bust you means you watch your speedometer -- not other cars, not kids, not the road. Totally dangerous.
It's safer to have a traffic light that operates during certain hours.
CARBON NEUTRAL?? The thing that separates the intelligent from the imbecilic is found in the quote at the beginning of today's post: "....most people's opinions form their facts."
Put 1000 devotees of the carbon reduction movement in a room and ask them a few simple questions:
Where does CO2 come from?
How do you know carbon is a pollutant?
If our environment is stable, now, what will be the effect of lowering the CO2 level?
How will we know we've reached the optimum CO2 level and can go back to living normally?
If the CO2 problem is eliminated, will taxes go down?
Of course, there is no possibility of answering these questions factually, or honestly, without abandoning the entire carbon hoax. But, one thing is true: you would not change one liberal's mind.
thank you
I'm not sure what you're asking on the cancer article, Jerome, but maybe it's related to this...?
The covid shots are apparently known to cause severe issues in what seem rather random body areas and at random timings after the shot. Separately, 5G is known to have certain affects on biomass and possibly on graphene et al within the shot elements. So, the 5G frequencies (very different from other frequencies) is possibly activating, and/or accelerating, the various cancerous and clotting issues presented by the shots.
Sincere apologies if this was not your question.
Also, I use qualifiers like "possibly", "seems like", etc to restrain those who are still not convinced of the deadly effects of the shot and of 5G etc.
I worked several years face-to-face with dozens of MDs and PhDs and others on dozens of NIH funded studies (including 1 DOD funded virus study) at various top USA university medical labs and have seen levels of fudging, twisting, obfuscating, and sometimes out right lying about test results... all based on professional and employment fears, greed, and power. It was growing very strongly a few years ago, so must be a massive and terrible issue now.
How quickly this nation has turned against itself!
That's a great video. Disease X is here.
20 MPH. OK, this one hit a nerve. I know this is mostly going on in the UK.
I've been driving since I was 12 years old. I've operated everything from farm tractors to motorcycles, to tractor-trailers to school buses to passenger vehicles.
There is an ideal speed-to-load ratio for every vehicle. When it comes to vehicles designed for roadways, it is NOT below 40 mph. The gearing, engine RPM, etc., are designed to propel the vehicle at roadway speeds.
This is what angers me about Pennsylvania roads in populated areas. The traffic geniuses intentionally time traffic lights so, driving at the posted speed, you'll hit red lights.
I spoke with a traffic engineer about a stretch of roadway about 20 miles through an urban area where I travel from our airport. I often drive it between midnight and 4:00 am when there is almost no traffic. I found that I can hit green lights driving 78 mph, or 12 mph. Otherwise, I'm stopping at every other light.
Their rationale is that it "calms the traffic." Yes, that's a direct quote! I told the pinhead who said it: "BULL-SH**!!" It enrages drivers and gobbles fuel! ...especially when traffic is heavy and riddled with big trucks.
And, at midnight, it's my "whack-a-mole" game with the cops to see if I can get home without a ticket.
He was the perfect embodiment of the "....most people use opinion to form their facts."
Finally, I've concluded that there IS NO MORE DANGEROUS SPEED TO TRAVEL than below 20 mph: What is the ONLY reason you drive that slow? It's because there's a damn sign telling you to! That necessarily means a cop is waiting for you to exceed it.
So, instead of your eyes on the road, where are they? ON THE SPEEDOMETER, or looking for the cop!
School zones are the worst! The 15 mph speed limit with a cop sitting in the median ready to bust you means you watch your speedometer -- not other cars, not kids, not the road. Totally dangerous.
It's safer to have a traffic light that operates during certain hours.