11 Comments
Oct 18, 2022Liked by Karen Bracken

I like the article on the NAU and I commend Rep. Matt Gaetz for questioning Sec of State Blinken. That is why Rep. Gaetz is a true patriot! Great work!

Expand full comment
Oct 18, 2022Liked by Karen Bracken

Another great substack! Shared!

Expand full comment

I have a different take.

https://netroots.substack.com/p/tulsi-gabbard-disavows-wef-and-cfr

It seems to me that Gabbard's acknowledgment is confirmed by your research. She got into WEF and tweeted it, but anything else? And CRF, she got in, it expired, but anything else? I don't see the actions which point toward the judgement.

Also, look at what she's done in the past two years, was she shilling for the vax and masks? idk for sure, but I care more about anyones actions since March '20 over everything. idk of any instance where Gabbard endorsed the 'great reset' or endorsed any of that totalitarian mistep under the guise of Covid 19, right? Plus, remember what Tulsi did to Harris in the debate? That to me is an action. She pissed off Democrats for the same reason many of us have, like Kari Lake.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 18, 2022·edited Oct 18, 2022Author

Well look up her voting record. She is a shill and why would she be a member of WEF for 7 years and CFR for 5 years if not one of them? Sorry your naivety is why this country is in trouble. Obviously you still believe in what they SAY instead of what they DO. We cannot take a chance on someone like her. If you just use some common sense it is very feasible they are running her to look like a conservative only to insure one of their own gets elected no matter what party wins. A lot cheaper and easier to do (because Americans are still sucked in by their lying words)this than to steal yet another Presidential election. Just look at her stand on the issues. SHE BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE and that we must change to renewable energy. This is a straight out of the WEF/UN agenda. Look her up on all the other leftist issues. She is a globalist shill.

Expand full comment

I just pointed to what she did, her actions, that's all I talked about in my comment. Other than first dismissing your unfounded judgment which seems based on nothing in particular that I can see so far...

"SHE BELIEVE IN CLIMATE CHANGE "

Uh, so do I. Its an oxymoron. The climate changes. I doubt she talks about it any more or less than any other politician. How many have you heard acknowledge that the magnetic north pole has been shifting now at a rate of 5 miles a month, astounding any climate observer that is paying attention? Anyone? Don't look up.

Expand full comment
author

You are not pointing to what she DID you are pointing to what she SAID. Here is some of her voting record on abortion. Oh so because others have bought into the lie or ever better have been PAID to buy into the lie its ok for her to go along with them? You need to look at what she has DONE while in Congress. https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/129306/tulsi-gabbard/2/abortion

Expand full comment

Tulsi looks just like a Trojan Horse to me. Perfect on the outside, filled with something else.

Expand full comment
author

And she is trying to lie her way out of it. Pete Santilli covered her interview with Rogan. He brought out all of her questionable affiliations. We cannot afford to take a chance on someone like her. There are others that have never been associated with WEF or the CFR. She is a shill. I believe they will do whatever it takes to get her be the nominee in 2024 and then they will have one of their own no matter what party wins the general election. They will just have to steal the nomination then sit back and let the uninformed vote for one of their own who would now be running in both parties (of course that has taken place for a long time but this time is even worse)

Expand full comment

In Ireland, Michael Brazil (aka The Irish Git) rang Pfizer and asked them for a definition of 'the speed of science'

https://t.me/michaelbrazil/4445

Expand full comment
author

That was great. I believe the definition in the meme is spot on and answers Michael’s question,

Expand full comment

Agree! The meme captures it. And perhaps 'dollars-per-second' is how we calibrate it :-D

Expand full comment