...hi again Karen, i commented the following at the article in link i posted below, and it 'constitutes' a useful refutation of this bleedin baloney about anyone's supposed concerns for 'future generations' ..."...in regard to the 'Declaration of Future Generations' and point 33 (!) in it's connection it is worth noting that Thomas Paine in his 'Rights of Man' made a noteworthy observation through the following, and exposed it's contrived efforts in establishing tyranny... 'The English Parliament of 1688 did a certain thing, which, for themselves and their constituents, they had a right to do, and which it appeared right should be done. But, in addition to this right, which they possessed by delegation, they set up another right by assumption, that of binding and controlling posterity to the end of time. The case, therefore, divides itself into two parts; the right which they possessed by delegation, and the right which they set up by assumption. The first is admitted; but with respect to the second, I reply --
There never did, there never will, and there never can, exist a Parliament, or any description of men, or any generation of men, in any country, possessed of the right or the power of binding and controlling posterity to the "end of time," or of commanding for ever how the world shall be governed, or who shall govern it; and therefore all such clauses, acts or declarations by which the makers of them attempt to do what they have neither the right nor the power to do, nor the power to execute, are in themselves null and void.Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow. The Parliament or the people of 1688, or of any other period, had no more right to dispose of the people of the present day, or to bind or to control them in any shape whatever, than the parliament or the people of the present day have to dispose of, bind or control those who are to live a hundred or a thousand years hence. Every generation is, and must be, competent to all the purposes which its occasions require. It is the living, and not the dead, that are to be accommodated. When man ceases to be, his power and his wants cease with him; and having no longer any participation in the concerns of this world, he has no longer any authority in directing who shall be its governors, or how its government shall be organised, or how administered'"... https://www.ushistory.org/paine/rights/c1-010.htm ...
Thank You. That's's a great article by Elizabeth Nickson. I agree with Dr Ladapo, it's coming to an end.
Passing this forward. Everywhere
Thank you
...hi again Karen, i commented the following at the article in link i posted below, and it 'constitutes' a useful refutation of this bleedin baloney about anyone's supposed concerns for 'future generations' ..."...in regard to the 'Declaration of Future Generations' and point 33 (!) in it's connection it is worth noting that Thomas Paine in his 'Rights of Man' made a noteworthy observation through the following, and exposed it's contrived efforts in establishing tyranny... 'The English Parliament of 1688 did a certain thing, which, for themselves and their constituents, they had a right to do, and which it appeared right should be done. But, in addition to this right, which they possessed by delegation, they set up another right by assumption, that of binding and controlling posterity to the end of time. The case, therefore, divides itself into two parts; the right which they possessed by delegation, and the right which they set up by assumption. The first is admitted; but with respect to the second, I reply --
There never did, there never will, and there never can, exist a Parliament, or any description of men, or any generation of men, in any country, possessed of the right or the power of binding and controlling posterity to the "end of time," or of commanding for ever how the world shall be governed, or who shall govern it; and therefore all such clauses, acts or declarations by which the makers of them attempt to do what they have neither the right nor the power to do, nor the power to execute, are in themselves null and void.Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow. The Parliament or the people of 1688, or of any other period, had no more right to dispose of the people of the present day, or to bind or to control them in any shape whatever, than the parliament or the people of the present day have to dispose of, bind or control those who are to live a hundred or a thousand years hence. Every generation is, and must be, competent to all the purposes which its occasions require. It is the living, and not the dead, that are to be accommodated. When man ceases to be, his power and his wants cease with him; and having no longer any participation in the concerns of this world, he has no longer any authority in directing who shall be its governors, or how its government shall be organised, or how administered'"... https://www.ushistory.org/paine/rights/c1-010.htm ...
... thanks yet again Karen, i went straight for the CRG Colin Todd Hunter article, great, as is every link herein ur post, and this one which, i'm tryin to read, is up there with the best... some of what Cory Lynn writes often flashes through my consciousness when I'm negotiating 'the web', anyway here's the link... https://drjacobnordangard.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-goal-of-the-pact-for?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1015075&post_id=147193532&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1uo2p8&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email ...